At this moment I want chocolate so badly I might kill for it.
I'm in the mood to nitpick, and rant. Nitpick first. I love the PotC movies. I love the layers and depth and lotsaplots. I love discussing. But! I get really really pissed off when people take a certain aspect and rip it to death trying to analyze what it really all meant.
"Why was Elizabeth sitting in the rain crying in her pretty dress when Will doesn't show up for the wedding/gets arrested by the EITC?"
This can be applied to all kinds of "mis"characterizations. "Why did Mulder break down Scully's door instead of calling her cell phone?" "Why did Obi Wan tell Luke to go to his teacher Yoda when he was trained by Qui Gon?" "Why did Jack send Will to the Flying Dutchman to pay his debt?" "Why did Elizabeth think the compass was pointing at Jack when it wasn't?"
You get the picture.
Beloved, Hollywood has wiggle room for these kind of screw ups. It's four little words called It's For Dramatic Emphasis. Either that or it's just TPTB not bothering to follow up with actual character motivation! *gasp* Not that!
Rant is next.
I write Pirates fanfic. I created my own character, a match for Jack Sparrow. They have about a jazillion adventures together. And sports, torture, giants, true love...errr, wait. Sorry. That's for another movie. *crazy smile* But you get the idea. And I am protective of my fic, and my original character. Someone mentioned the other day that they usually don't read stories with new characters, only the ones from the movies. OK, wait, hold on right there.
Did you not notice that new people were introduced in each movie?? Tia Dalma and Davy Jones, both new characters in DMC. Captain Teague and Pirate Lord Sao Feng, new characters. How come mine doesn't count because *I* created her? *insert sound of whining here*
As I said to someone else earlier tonight, I'm gonna sail the ship I like!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 03:49 am (UTC)I know, I know, it just isn't the same.
I hope this isn't a reaction to my earlier post and the subsequent comments (?)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 03:54 am (UTC)No, not a direct result, but possibly contributory. But in a good way. The comments I read on your post made me think. I like that. Other discussion I have read just give me a headahce. Can't say as I've had that happen on your journal yet, and I've been lurking a fair while.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 04:19 am (UTC)Aargh! Wank is baaaaaaddddddd.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 12:39 pm (UTC)This rant/nitpick was actually born from a discussion I read on POTC discussion comm. Someone asked about card game that feautured Will and Liz as King and Queen and Jack as *snicker* Jack. And since Jack had put them both in thier positions of power, would he influence their son's life? The very first comment was someone saying that W/E were smart enough to keep their family far away from him. Another said that W/E were way smarter than J.
How can people dislike a main character of a movie they love that much?? Honestly, I DON'T understand haters. Of anything. Really don't, they just puzzle me.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 02:19 pm (UTC)I don't understand haters, either, or why anyone feels the need to spend time indulging even dislike on a fanboard. How is that fun? And btw, Disney makes the same cards with Jack and Liz as King and Queen, and Will as the knave. The Mouse don't miss a trick *g*